I found it boring to only solving problems by myself.
Only a few classes I have attended have interactive problem solving sessions, those classes ROCKED.
---List of problem solving sessions I had on campus--- ignore if you don't care---
CSE 150, I think this is the best course I have taken in my entire life. I assume this class is somewhat like classes in AwesomeMath or other math camps. Students engaged and anticipated in solving the problems.
CSE 350, especially the recitation, is similar to CSE 150.
There are two other classes related to problem solving, but not that interactive.
CSE 392. Most of the thinking for the problems are done outside classroom. The class is basically explaining how someone solved it.
MAT 160. I been to the class only twice. It seems to be like: Do the hw, discuss how it is done. Instead of doing it in class. What's good about the class, is there are people who are enthusiastic about solving the problems.
I expect to try MAT 260 and see how it works.
Other than courses, there are 2 other places I had done some problem solving.
Math club. Last semester the preparation for Putnam, the clubbers have done some problems.
ACM practice was also similar.
--------------------end list---------------------
I feel it's not enough. There is a lack of interactive problem solving sessions on campus. Won't it be nice if there is some club that meet sometimes every week and work on some problem collaboratively. Problems of math, computer science and physics nature. i.e. Union of math/cs/physics club and intersect it with problem solving.
Some possible format.
ARML/HMMT team competition like.
People can organize them into smaller groups, working on a set of problems at a time.
Then people explain their ideas.
Seminar like. Someone pick out some set of problem, and direct the flow of the solvers, ask for participation, until the problem get solved.(Similar to last semester's math club)
Just putting the idea out there. I would totally come to events like this.
It should be in future tense, I was right on almost all problems on the last hw I submitted. Those are some classical counting problems.
I'm dying from AMS 311 hw no.2(due tomorrow). I'm getting almost every single question wrong during the first attempt and require extensive amount of time to correct them in a period of 8 hours with help of various people(#math in freenode). I need to find a systematic way to deal with this when I find some time.
It's still possible there are errors in my extensively corrected hw.
What's the probability of being dealt one pair from poker?(a,a,b,c,d. where a,b,c,d are distinct values)
Seven balls randomly withdraw from an urn, find the probability that 3 red, 2 blue, and 2 green balls are withdrawn.
Suppose that n balls are randomly distributed into N compartments. Find the probability that m balls will fall into the first compartment. Assume that all N^n arrangements are equally likely.
I got all those question wrong the first time I tried(and these just tip of the iceberg).
They are suppose to be easy problems, it's hw problem from a introductory probability text.
How can I not get it? I have no problem doing CSE 555 problems(although hard, but at least I don't get wrong answers). I can do MAT 160 problems(btw, they are interesting) with a reasonable amount of confidence. In my opinion those problems suppose to be way harder than the ones in AMS 311.
There is something wrong with my counting skills. I can't count correctly. Inclusion exclusion principle and other counting principles are not what I didn't master. I always have stupid reasoning during counting.
For example, for the balls and urn problem. I thought, there are 12 ways to chose the first red ball, 11 for 2nd red ball, 10 for 3rd red ball and etc. The probability would be
. At the moment I found it perfectly reasonable, then I did a calculation. WRONG, it's greater than 1.
Then I realized it's 
Interesting how I got the question just before the balls one correct the first attempt.
A forest contain 20 elks, 5 are captured, tagged then released. Then 4 of the 20 elks are captured, what's the probability that 2 of these 4 have been tagged?
That question is almost isomorphic to the balls one. Why do I have a complete different set of reasoning for the 2 problems?
I don't get it.
Do I not understand counting?
What if when I did some probability wrong, but it is something smaller than 1? I will get the problem wrong and only realize it when I get my hw back.
I feel like I will fail the first midterm.
Oh well, seems like I have to do every single problem in the textbook.
I did my planning for Spring 2010 semester a long time ago.
It is quite strange, everything worked out so well. Maybe too well.
Suspicious.
19 credit limit is coming up in 2 days, so I checked my plan just in case.
HOLY SHIT. My plan is completely ruined.
I ignored the fact that CSE 350 is a 4 credit course. So currently I have 17 credits.
My original plan was to pick AMS 311, then MAT 310 during each credit limit increase, so I have exactly 23 credit worth of awesomeness.
Easy way out: Not taking ITS 102 this semester. I can still follow up with all my plans.
I have one more spring anyways.
Thx a lot for that mandatory 2 credits. My opinion: ITS 101+102 is totally useless. Replace that with ITS 102 and a "common sense challenge exam" would be much better.
In other news.
I'm still waiting for instructors permission for me to take MAT 310.
Is it me or is MIT Press really awesome? I can't believe how many amazing books come out from MIT press. A lot of the more serious books in my book list are from MIT Press.
I can't say anymore about those book anymore than why I want to read them.
Learning list for this Winter and Spring 2010. I will keep this page updated so I know how far I am from all my goals(apart from long term goals of finish SICP/
CLRS/TAoCP/CM before college ends,(TAoCP before college ends? not likely...))
Write a function to perform integer division without using either the / or * operators. Find a fast way to do it.
My algorithm is
where
. This book and the following book can be founded on SpringerLink. If you are in a university, you might able to get the pdf version for free. Plan: Finish every exercise in the book before semester starts.
A few more to squeeze in if I have time or the mood: Hacker's Delight, The Princeton Companion to Mathematics, What Is Mathematics? An Elementary Approach to Ideas and Methods, Conceptual foundations of international politics, Evolution, ecology and behavior, Literary Theory, The Future of Human Health,Why People Believe Weird Things: Pseudoscience, Superstition, and Other Confusions of Our Time,Riot at the Calc Exam and Other Mathematically Bent Stories.
Now to my 2nd topic.
While I was trying to search for "Proof and Other Dilemmas" on the local library, I stumbled upon this epic work.
Proof by Seduction(Historical romance novel). OMG did someone take the joke by Brown Sharpie to a whole new level?[Link to the proof by seduction comic].
There is no way this is a coincidence. The pun was totally intended.
Yes, I was right, here is a passage from the author's website where she explains about the title.
There”s a method of mathematical proof called a “Proof by Induction.” Induction is a method of logical thinking, and it’s closely related to another kind of logical thinking (deduction).
Ahh, I knew!
Oh wait, what does she mean by induction is related to deduction? Wasn't she just talking about mathematical induction a sentence before? Did she get induction and mathematical induction mixed up? Did she forget to create a new paragraph to eliminate the confusing?
She later states
The nitpicky amongst you will note that Gareth, as a scientist, really only employs the method of inductive reasoning, not ever a proof by induction. This bothered me to no small extent, but ultimately “Proof by Seduction” is a much, much better title than “Proof by Seductive Reasoning” and elegance won out over the desire to have an arcane pun that was both arcane and nitpicky.
Oh, I see.
Really? Calling the book proof by seduction and not letting the main character do at least one proof by induction? That's just outrageous. I'm sure anyone can squeeze a proof of rational number can be written as a product of factorials and it's reciprocals in their novel.
Still, it's awesome to see a epic pun become a title of a book.
Classes I'm taking next semester
I will not list the section if there is only one.
AMS 301-02 wait listed
OMG the professor is Estie Arkin. If I remembered correctly, President Kunin of the math club recommend her to me (or is it some other female professor?). The class wasn't full yesterday. in other news, AMS 301-01 is almost empty. Well, who is Professor Ning Sun anyway. oh wait, she is a Ph.D student. that might be why everyone is crowded in section 2. But it be awesome if anyone who is already in section 2 want to support her class. :)
CSE 350
Rawr, I can't believe how many classes are the same time as CSE 350. (CSE 331 for instance) there are at least 5 more classes I can pick are on the exact same time.
CSE 392
Skiena will be doing programming challenges for this class. AWESOME. I like challenges.
ITS 102-S17
If you like math, chose this one for your ITS class. Alan Tucker, the author of Applied Combinatorics, is doing this class.
MAT 160
If you like math, chose this one too. MATH PUZZLE and GAMES
MAT 200-02
I like smaller classes, so I chose this one. Also because I know 2 people who are actually interested in math going for this class too.
15 credits. For now...
Anyone in my same classes leave a comment.
This is not exactly what I expected because CSE 373 is closed. WTF man.
I'm not going to do any writing next semester. or a few semester beyond. I will leave everything to later... yeah... very late...
Give me a break, I'm trying to get a 4.0 GPA(for at least 2 years) here. I can't let DEC and writing screw up my awesome MAT/CSE GPA.
Let's see if the registrar going to call me and force me to take one. It seems SBU can't force me to take any classes I didn't sign up myself. Try convince me to sign up this time! MWHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA. I'm not taking any writing! BITE ME! (unless the consequence is expulsion/suspension/a hold/restriction on the amount of bacon I can consume).
So I talked with the adviser. Seems like I can hold writing till later time. AWESOME.
I'm thinking of not going to my current ESL class and just get a U. U doesn't count in my GPA. C does. This is like a withdraw from the class, except I get a U instead of a W. I don't have to wasting all my effort to get a C. I just don't do it and wait till my Junior year or something. Please give me your opinion on that because I found this sound non-orthodox.
I'm going to get a U because I can. (by skipping 2 classes. I'm experienced with skipping classes. My professor sometimes look at me as if "is he even in my class?".)
Oh right, it is a huge waste of 3 credits. At least I have those time free to do something else for the rest of the semester.
Recent comments
8 min 1 sec ago
9 min 28 sec ago
10 min 35 sec ago
12 min 6 sec ago
12 min 10 sec ago
12 min 26 sec ago
14 min 16 sec ago
14 min 38 sec ago
1 hour 42 min ago
2 hours 35 min ago